
16 Aug
2014
16 Aug
'14
4:13 p.m.
Jason White <jason@jasonjgw.net> writes:
Spamassassin - when last I used it, accuracy wasn't adequate (at least for classifying my mail) and it tended to be memory-intensive if Bayesian filtering was enabled.
I use SA, with spamd and memory usage isn't as much of a problem as it was 10 years ago or something. It turns out I have (at least) an order of magnitude more RAM in boxes running SA now. I find it fairly accurate. I also fed it large amounts of spam/ham to train it... and I honestly never look in what it classifies as spam. -- Stewart Smith