Daniel Jitnah <djitnah@greenwareit.com.au> wrote:
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 00:15 +1000, Les Kitchen wrote: Hi Les,
Oh, about your (Daniel's) LA-linkup resolution: I was going to post to luv-main, but I'm too tired to start a new mail message, so I'll just dump my thoughts here. I like the spirit of your motion, but I'm just worried that it's not debugged yet, and we won't be able to even do a proper code walk-through before Tuesday.
This is true, and it's an important reason for my voting against the disincorporation resolution: rejecting that resolution now gives Luv time to explore the alternatives fully.
In this proposal, all the details are of course the subject of discussion between interested parties and Member contribution will be welcome. The actual agreement if we get there will be agreed to by LA and LUV. Consistent with the spirit, I will suggest that the LA rep will be appointed by LA and up to them how they decide who that person may be.
That seems reasonable to me. If Luv exists after Tuesday (as an incorporated body), these and other details can be worked through.