On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 04:56:05PM +1100, Paul van den Bergen wrote:
> Funny, I was asked about exactly the same problem when I started
> @WEHI... only there was no attempt made to even start tackling the
> problem...
yeah, we were constantly getting individual academics and research
groups asking us about storage, and then trying to do the best we could
with minimal resources.
the unfortunate fact is that disks/storage arrays and file-servers
and tape libraries etc are expensive. You can replace a very large
percentage of your up-front capital expense with skilled techs, which
are an on-going cost (you're going to need them to look after expensive
equipment anyway, and it has to be maintained & upgraded for 7+ years),
but it's still going to cost a lot for huge data storage anyway, even if
you avoid over-priced name-brand gear.
> Virtualisation of workload makes the problem a lot easier to tackle,
> but even so... 7 years is a long time in IT...
cheap big disks helps a lot too. but you need a lot of them, plus
backup - on-site and off-site.
CPU & RAM are more than adequate for pretty nearly any file-storage
needs these days...could always use more of both for computational
stuff.
craig
--
craig sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
_______________________________________________
luv-main mailing list
luv-main@luv.asn.au
https://lists.luv.asn.au/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/luv-main