On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 09:08:50AM +1100, Tony Langdon via luv-main wrote:
On 25/11/2015 9:13 PM, Erik Christiansen via luv-main wrote:
Interestingly, 'r', 'g', and 'L' all work correctly on Tony's posts, & Rick's, and Brian's. (And yet, Reply-To: is similar in all. Tried it 5 times, and can't for the life of me see why yours behave differently.)
Same result here. Only Craig's posts don't allow me to reply to all. This function worked properly with your post just now, Erik.
now that's really bizarre. I can understand why my MUA (mutt) has difficulty with Reply-To (because I have a procmail rule to rename that header to X-Old-Reply-To to defeat the Reply-To munging of some lists, so there is no Reply-To header for mutt to use). But there's no reason why a message I send to this list should be any different to a message sent by someone else. I do make a habit of trimming the CC: header unless I really want to send a CC to someone, which doesn't happen often - I usually want to send either a list reply or a private reply, almost never both. craig -- craig sanders <cas@taz.net.au>