On 6 April 2012 12:29, Lindsay Sprinter <zlinw@mcmedia.com.au> wrote:
On Fri, 6 Apr 2012, Jason White wrote:
Lindsay Sprinter <zlinw@mcmedia.com.au> wrote:
On the 4th of april I had a packaged dipatched from the UK order number #112460.
I'm not sure how this pertains to Linux... suggest taking it to luv-talk.
_______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list luv-main@luv.asn.au http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
I am not on luv-talk so I cannot see replies. I __DO__NOT___ wish to recieve luv-talk if Jason or the commitee wishes to force me on to said list then I am sorry the luv lists can walk over that cliff over there.............
Why one has to be so restricted when wishing to discuss important topics such as security is beyond "this little black duck".
Sigh.............. Looks as though my time on the luv lists is final going to end as this is the second episode.
Lindsay _______________________________________________ luv-main mailing list luv-main@luv.asn.au http://lists.luv.asn.au/listinfo/luv-main
I can only agree with Jason, who was suggesting yu take to luv-talk. It clearly states on the LUV website at http://luv.asn.au/mailinglists.htmlthe following uner Rules and Guidelines: "5. *luv-main* is for LUV- or Linux-related posts The *luv-main* mailing list is for discussion of LUV- or Linux-related topics. Some example relevant topics are: questions about Linux, announcements of general-interest Linux news, and discussions about LUV presentations. When asking questions, it is advisable to first read the relevant Linux documentation or howto documents. LUV helps those who help themselves. Dissenting views are welcome, but advocacy discussions are better suited to the luv-talk list." As your OP was niether about linux nor LUV he is correct. Everyone else plays by those rules, why shouldn't you?