On 30/11/16 16:03, Brian May via luv-main wrote:
A bigger issue I see concerning LUV is that the November Special General Meeting was adjourned due to lack of quorum. I couldn't go myself because I was sick.
That's standard practice for all LUV AGMs and SGMs. We never have quorum, because quorum is defined in our constitution as 10% of the membership. Our membership is defined by the luv-announce mailing list and is currently 1463 members, so quorum would be 146 attendees. We've never had that many people attend a meeting, so we always adjourn votes and pass them at the adjourned meeting under the relaxed quorum rules for adjourned meetings.
It has been been months(?) since this subcommittee has been proposed again, yet the first serious discussion I see was from yesterday. Does this mean everyone now agrees with it and there is no need to discuss it? Or maybe people have lost interest?
Well, it has been discussed a number of times already over the last few years including on the lists and in person at both main and beginners meetings, so I imagine many members have already expressed their views. But of course we're always happy to hear more feedback! Cheers, Andrew